Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Pollen morphology of Andrographis Wallich, Cystacanthus T. Anderson, Diotacanthus Bentham, Gymnostachyum Nees, Haplanthus Nees and Phlogacanthus Nees from Andrographideae (Acanthaceae) is described and illustrated. Pollen morphological variation is compared to accepted generic limits. Pollen morphology provides additional discrete character support for Andrographis, Diotacanthus, Haplanthus and Phlogacanthus being monophyletic but not for Cystacanthus and Gymnostachyum. Previous attempts to diagnose Andrographideae pollen are discussed and a new diagnosis is given. A dichotomous key for the identification of genera by pollen morphology is provided. Rhombochlamys and Hulemacanthus, which have been classified with Andrographideae on the basis of pollen morphology, are discussed and illustrated. © 1992.

Original publication




Journal article


Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology

Publication Date





229 - 243