Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Humans have an unusual mating system - nominally monogamous pair-bonds set within multimale/multifemale communities. In the context of large, dispersed communities, this inevitably places a significant stress on mating strategies, especially for males for whom paternity uncertainty is a real problem. I discuss the nature of this bonding process in terms of the proximate mechanisms that make it possible, and then ask why such a phenomenon might have evolved. I suggest that the evidence for the importance of biparental care (the conventional explanation) is weak, and a more likely explanation is that females attached themselves to males in order to reduce the risks of harassment and infanticide from other males (the 'hired gun' hypothesis). Finally, I ask when pair-bonds of this kind might have evolved during the course of hominin evolution, and suggest that it might have been quite late. © The British Academy 2010.


Journal article


Proceedings of the British Academy

Publication Date