Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Arguably, partnerships emerged to address knowledge deficits inherent in other modes of coordination, in understanding between different agencies and arms of government ('silo mentality'), and between government and the people it serves.As an increasingly prevalent form of governance, there is concern about whether partnerships produce benefits that contribute to the public good.This article considers their value in producing intangible assets in the form of knowledge.Tacit, embodied knowledge enhances an individual's capacity to act. Using the concept of intangible assets, we propose a more relational approach to understanding governance that challenges the current instrumentalist thinking within the UK Labour government's modernisation agenda. © The Policy Press, 2008.

Original publication




Journal article


Policy and Politics

Publication Date





209 - 224