Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Forty-four academic pure mathematicians were given Levine's (1982) computational estimation task, which involved estimating the answers to 20 multiplication and division problems and describing the strategies used. The mathematicians were accurate estimators, and they used a great variety of strategies, as many as 23 for a single problem. All but 2 of the mathematicians used some strategy that was not used by the other 43 for at least one problem. When 18 mathematicians were retested after an interval of several months, they used different strategies on the second test for 9 to 17 of the 20 problems. Some theoretical implications of these findings are discussed


Journal article


Journal for Research in Mathematics Education


National Council of Teachers of Mathematics

Publication Date





45 - 55


Mathematical cognition, Estimation, Cognitive strategies, Flexibility, Mathematicians