Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Ecology is a disparate discipline with studies ranging from the highly abstract to the highly applied. Understanding ecological concepts often involves the use of theoretical models, laboratory studies, and/or field studies, all of which exist on a continuum, with laboratory experiments often considered to be somewhere between abstract theoretical models and the field studies of the natural world. Laboratory systems have many appealing features such as ease of culturing, manipulation, minimal sampling difficulties, repeatability, and quantifiable resource supply, but there are more fundamental reasons for using laboratory microcosms. Long-term population (time series) studies are the cornerstone for testing hypotheses about the processes and mechanisms of population regulation, limitation, and persistence. However, field studies of population ecology suffer from a double jeopardy. While ecological time series are at the heart of population ecological research, they are often of insufficient length and are unreplicated which makes statistical inferences often weak or even impossible. Laboratory experiments provide one solution to this jeopardy by allowing well-replicated, long-term experiments to be done under controlled environmental conditions. The use of laboratory or model systems in ecology has been widely advocated as a plausible and realistic approach to understanding the processes and mechanisms underpinning ecological systems (Kareiva, 1989; Lawton, 1995). In this review, we discuss the use of laboratory microcosms in understanding ecological concepts focusing particularly on the ideas central to population ecology. However, our rationale and approach is equally applicable to evolutionary and genetic experiments, and can be more widely applied in the design and implementation of field-based ecological experiments. We begin by outlining the philosophy and rationale for laboratory microcosm experiments. We emphasize the role of appropriate model selection and choice as the underlying approach for integrating ecological theory and experiments. Following this, we review the historical contributions that laboratory experiments have made to our understanding of a number of core ecological concepts. In the final section, we conclude by examining the prospects for the use of laboratory systems in ecological research. © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/S0065-2504(04)37001-7

Type

Journal article

Journal

Advances in Ecological Research

Publication Date

01/12/2005

Volume

37

Pages

1 - 36