Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Recently, we reported the simulation of a stable open state of the glycine receptor. Central to the stability of the simulations was the behavior of the highly conserved leucine residues at the 9' gate, which were found to rotate into adjacent pockets, thus providing a structural rationale for decades of biochemical observations. In contrast, a previously reported model from Cerdan et al. (2018) resembled a more collapsed state. However, in support of their model, they draw attention to the agreement between calculated and experimental conductance measurements and argue that our model tends to overestimate ion flow. Here, we argue that there are many pitfalls with this approach and that the apparent agreement most likely reflects a fortuitous cancellation of errors. The computed values are highly sensitive to very small changes in model parameters. It is also likely that polarization effects will be very significant, and these have not yet been considered.

Original publication




Journal article



Publication Date





601 - 603


Receptors, Glycine