Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

This article examines children's discourse about self, brain and behaviour, focusing on the dynamics of power, knowledge and responsibility articulated by children. The empirical data discussed in this article are drawn from the study of Voices on Identity, Childhood, Ethics and Stimulants, which included interviews with 151 US and UK children, a subset of whom had a diagnosis of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Despite their contact with psychiatric explanations and psychotropic drugs for their behaviour, children's discursive engagements with the brain show significant evidence of agency and negotiated responsibility. These engagements suggest the limitations of current concepts that describe a collapse of the self into the brain in an age of neurocentrism. Empirical investigation is needed in order to develop agent-centred conceptual and theoretical frameworks that describe and evaluate the harms and benefits of treating children with psychotropic drugs and other brain-based technologies.

Original publication

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01531.x

Type

Journal article

Journal

Sociol Health Illn

Publication Date

07/2013

Volume

35

Pages

813 - 827

Keywords

ADHD, Ritalin, brain, children, self, Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Child, Child Behavior, Decision Making, Humans, Male, Neurosciences, Power (Psychology), Self Psychology, Social Stigma, Surveys and Questionnaires, United Kingdom, United States, Voice