Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Assessment of gene function generally requires knowledge of the sites of action of gene products. Several experimental approaches can provide relevant information, but all have their limitations and the potential for experimental artifact. In this article we focus on the endomembrane organelles and on the methods that can be used to validate the location of fluorescent protein fusions. We discuss the utility of redundant localization techniques, complementation of mutant phenotypes, and integration of localization data with expected biological function as methods to achieve consensus. We argue that no single piece of evidence is sufficient to address the issue, and that all approaches can reveal useful information about the true steady state location of a protein or about other aspects of its transport and dynamics. As ever, the critical point is the subjective interpretation one puts on each observation in light of the experimental conditions and other pertinent data. We illustrate these points with some successes and failures in our own work.

Original publication

DOI

10.1105/tpc.109.068668

Type

Journal article

Journal

Plant Cell

Publication Date

06/2009

Volume

21

Pages

1632 - 1636

Keywords

Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Genetic Complementation Test, Immunohistochemistry, Intracellular Membranes, Luminescent Proteins, Mutation, Organelles, Phenotype, Plant Proteins, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Research Design