Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

In the present study, we presented picture-naming latencies along with ratings for a set of important characteristics of pictures and picture names: age of acquisition, frequency, picture-name agreement, name agreement, visual complexity, familiarity, and word length. The validity of these data was established by calculating correlations with previous studies. Regression analyses show that our ratings account for a larger amount of variance in RTs than do previous data. RTs were predicted by all variables except complexity and length. A complete database presenting details about all of these variables is available in the supplemental materials, downloadable from http://brm.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.

Original publication

DOI

10.3758/BRM.42.2.461

Type

Journal article

Journal

Behav Res Methods

Publication Date

05/2010

Volume

42

Pages

461 - 469

Keywords

Adult, Age Factors, England, Female, Humans, Language, Language Tests, Male, Names, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Recognition, Psychology, Visual Perception